-
-
Meta
-
Archives
-
Categories
- Art (185)
- Music (3)
- Poetry (107)
- Homer (75)
- Sylvia Plath (4)
- T. S. Eliot (12)
- Prose (71)
- Visual Art (26)
- Film (5)
- Education (54)
- Facebook (14)
- History (66)
- Archeology (6)
- Tourism (30)
- Language (35)
- Fowler (6)
- Grammar (12)
- Strunk and White (9)
- Turkish (7)
- Logic (12)
- Mathematics (76)
- Exposition (20)
- Mathematical Topics (10)
- Calculus (4)
- Conic Sections (6)
- Mathematicians (28)
- Archimedes (8)
- Euclid (20)
- G. H. Hardy (7)
- Philosophy of Mathematics (18)
- Nature (27)
- Philosophy (296)
- “God is a circle …” (5)
- Categorical Thinking (6)
- Causation (12)
- Contradiction (8)
- Criteriological Science (8)
- dialectic (28)
- Freedom (23)
- Ontological Proof (6)
- Pacifism (9)
- Persons (243)
- Aristotle (59)
- Collingwood (164)
- absolute presuppositions (18)
- “ceases to be a mind” (5)
- New Leviathan (70)
- overlap of classes (11)
- Principles of Art (46)
- question and answer (5)
- Descartes (18)
- Leo Strauss (11)
- Midgley (13)
- Pirsig (38)
- Plato (100)
- Philosophy of History (27)
- Sex and Gender (12)
- Stoicism (2)
- Psychology (19)
- Science (30)
- Galileo (7)
- Turkey (98)
- coup (3)
- Istanbul (59)
- Bosphorus (5)
- Gezi (8)
- The Islands (3)
- Tophane (3)
- Nesin Mathematics Village (27)
- Uncategorized (8)
- West Virginia (16)
- Art (185)
-
Recent Posts
Category Archives: Philosophy
Sources
January 16, 2024 – 1:48 pm
This is about intellect, wisdom, and prudence. They are strange subjects for discussion.
- If you have them, are you going to spend time talking about them?
- If you haven’t got them, what can you say about them?
Apparently I did talk about them with my classmates when we were undergraduates, even freshmen: too young for prudence, although not for wisdom, by Aristotle’s account below, at least in special pursuits such as geometry and mathematics.
Does that sound like wisdom? According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary (6th edition, 1976), wisdom is
experience and knowledge together with the power of applying them critically or practically; sagacity, prudence, common sense.
Aristotle is talking about σοφία though, and this can mean cleverness. Intellect and prudence are νούς and φρόνησις. Last time we saw the claim that the latter is prudence only in the older sense of “practical judgment,” not the sense of “playing it safe” that is current today.
Memory
January 11, 2024 – 7:23 am
We saw the soul divided in two, in Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics. In the present reading, of the first five of the 13 chapters of Book VI, Aristotle returns to the division, and he tells us he is returning. At least, what we are given in the text is,
πρότερον μὲν οὖν ἐλέχθη δύ᾽ εἶναι μέρη τῆς ψυχῆς.
It was stated previously, then, that there are two parts of the soul.
“It was stated previously.” The passive voice may mean that somebody else added this comment. We may also ask whether the comment is actually referring to an earlier passage of the work that we are now reading.
This is a difficulty of reading Aristotle. We don’t know, or at least I don’t know, whether Aristotle himself created the Ethics as a single work, comprising ten books, to be read in order; and if he did, whether he finished the work to his own satisfaction; and if he did, how well the text that has come down to us (apparently through Andronicus of Rhodes) represents Aristotle’s work.
The Miraculous
January 3, 2024 – 2:48 pm
The miracles recounted in the Gospels are not violations of the laws of nature, because the Evangelists had no conception of those laws in the first place. So I argued in a post of June, 2022. Having encountered resistance to the argument, I return to it now.
Righteousness
December 11, 2023 – 6:09 am
Words of Martin Luther King are on my mind:
No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.
My mother was there, at the March on Washington. She must then have heard a particular singer, whom my wife and I heard in concert, fifty-two years later. I wrote about this in “Joan Baez in Istanbul.”
Fire
November 29, 2023 – 9:15 am
There was a remark near the end of the last reading, in § v.18:
τοῦ δὲ ἀδικήματος
τὸ μὲν ἔλαττον ἀδικεῖσθαί ἐστι,
τὸ δὲ μεῖζον τὸ ἀδικεῖν.And with an unjust transaction,
having injustice done to one is less than the mean,
and doing the injustice is in excess of it.
(Sachs)Of the injustice done,
the smaller part is the suffering
and the larger part is the doing of injustice.
(Rackham)
At first glance – my first glance, anyway – Aristotle alludes here to the teaching of Socrates, which I tried to work out in “Doing and Suffering”: suffering injustice is less bad than doing it.
Symmetry
November 22, 2023 – 8:55 am
In the account of justice – the dicaeology – that I looked at last time, equality was a nominal concern. I said it might not be what we mean today by equality before the law. We may come closer to that in the present reading, but I’m not sure.
We have reached the part of the Nicomachean Ethics that I dipped into more than six years ago, when writing what ultimately became a long mathematical and historical paper, “On Commensurability and Symmetry” (Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, Volume 7 Issue 2 [July 2017], pages 90–148, DOI). Back then, I made only a precision raid, as if by helicopter, using coordinates supplied by the LSJ lexicon for the words of interest (σύμμετρος and συμμετρία). Now, in a party, we have been working our way in on foot.

Bread: money
Two loaves: equality
The flour is siyez (einkorn)
The leaven is sourdough
Both are from İstiklal Yolu in Kastamonu
Dicaeology
November 15, 2023 – 11:22 am
Our topic now is justice, in two senses:
- Lawfulness.
- Equity.
That doesn’t mean we’re talking about equality before the law. Instead of lawfulness and equity, we might refer to morality and fairness. What we are really trying to do is understand what Aristotle means, when he says that “the dikaion” (τὸ δίκαιον) is one of the following:
- “The nomimon” (τὸ νόμιμον).
- “The ison” (τὸ ἴσον).
Why would we want to do understand this? Well, that last Greek word appears as a suffix in isoskeles (ἰσοσκελής), which has become our word “isosceles” for the same thing. The ison is the equal. A triangle is isosceles when two of its legs are equal. Each of those legs is a skelos (σκέλος), while the remaining side is the basis (βάσις), the base.
Truth
November 5, 2023 – 9:00 am
According to the current version of a Wikipedia article,
The Nicomachean Ethics is widely considered[according to whom?] one of the most important works of philosophy.
The superscript bracketed italicized question was added by me. I thus took the liberty to edit Wikipedia, as we all may do.
Coolness
October 25, 2023 – 9:05 pm
When I was ten, I learned the adjective “magnanimous” from Star Trek. I learn now from Wikipedia that the episode called “Whom Gods Destroy” was unseen in the UK until 1994, and one reason was the scene that preceded the following dialogue:
- Garth of Izar
- She’s yours if you wish, Captain.
- Kirk
- Thank you, that’s – very magnanimous of you.
- Garth
- You will find that I am magnanimous – to my friends, and merciless to my enemies.
The woman referred to is called Marta. Garth styles himself Lord Garth, Master of the Universe, but he is mad. For Lee Erwin then, the writer of the episode, magnanimity would seem to be generosity exhibited by the powerful, or the deserving of power, at least in their own minds. This understanding is supported by definitions in the Concise Oxford Dictionary (sixth edition, 1976):
- magnanimous
- Noble, generous, not petty, in feelings or conduct.
- generous
- Magnanimous, noble-minded; not mean or prejudiced; free in giving, munificent.
Generosity is one word for the main subject of our previous reading. Etymologically, the word refers to birth, so that generosity is literally being of good family.
Nobility, by contrast, is being “in the know”: the letters “no” show the relation, while the K of “know” corresponds to a letter missing in “noble,” but retained in “ignoble.”
In its Latin parts, “magnanimity” is being of “great soul.” The word seems to be a calque of Aristotle’s μεγαλοψυχία, which is our main subject now.

From “Whom Gods Destroy”
Garth, Marta, Kirk, Spock
Screenshot from IMDb
I learned Star Trek
on a black-and-white TV
The effect
of Marta’s green skin
was lost on me







