I say that mathematics is the deductive science; and yet there would seem to be mathematicians who disagree. I take up two cases here.
-
Meta
-
Archives
-
Categories
- Art (133)
- Music (3)
- Poetry (70)
- Homer (45)
- Sylvia Plath (4)
- T. S. Eliot (9)
- Prose (47)
- Visual Art (25)
- Film (5)
- Education (51)
- Facebook (14)
- History (66)
- Archeology (6)
- Tourism (30)
- Language (33)
- Fowler (5)
- Grammar (12)
- Strunk and White (9)
- Turkish (7)
- Logic (12)
- Mathematics (66)
- Exposition (18)
- Mathematical Topics (9)
- Calculus (4)
- Conic Sections (5)
- Mathematicians (26)
- Archimedes (8)
- Euclid (18)
- G. H. Hardy (7)
- Philosophy of Mathematics (16)
- Nature (27)
- Philosophy (220)
- “God is a circle …” (4)
- Categorical Thinking (6)
- Causation (12)
- Contradiction (8)
- Criteriological Science (9)
- dialectic (26)
- Freedom (23)
- Ontological Proof (5)
- Pacifism (9)
- Persons (176)
- Aristotle (20)
- Collingwood (140)
- absolute presuppositions (18)
- “ceases to be a mind” (5)
- New Leviathan (69)
- overlap of classes (11)
- Principles of Art (41)
- question and answer (4)
- Descartes (16)
- Leo Strauss (9)
- Midgley (11)
- Pirsig (25)
- Plato (85)
- Philosophy of History (28)
- Sex and Gender (7)
- Stoicism (2)
- Psychology (19)
- Science (28)
- Galileo (6)
- Turkey (91)
- coup (3)
- Istanbul (55)
- Bosphorus (5)
- Gezi (8)
- The Islands (3)
- Tophane (3)
- Nesin Mathematics Village (26)
- Uncategorized (1)
- West Virginia (16)
- Art (133)
-
Recent Posts
- Cumberland Tour 1994
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 10
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 9
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 8
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 7
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 6
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 5
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 4
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 3
- On The Human Condition of Hannah Arendt 2