-
-
Meta
-
Archives
-
Categories
- Art (185)
- Music (3)
- Poetry (107)
- Homer (75)
- Sylvia Plath (4)
- T. S. Eliot (12)
- Prose (71)
- Visual Art (26)
- Film (5)
- Education (54)
- Facebook (14)
- History (66)
- Archeology (6)
- Tourism (30)
- Language (35)
- Fowler (6)
- Grammar (12)
- Strunk and White (9)
- Turkish (7)
- Logic (12)
- Mathematics (76)
- Exposition (20)
- Mathematical Topics (10)
- Calculus (4)
- Conic Sections (6)
- Mathematicians (28)
- Archimedes (8)
- Euclid (20)
- G. H. Hardy (7)
- Philosophy of Mathematics (18)
- Nature (27)
- Philosophy (295)
- “God is a circle …” (5)
- Categorical Thinking (6)
- Causation (12)
- Contradiction (8)
- Criteriological Science (8)
- dialectic (28)
- Freedom (23)
- Ontological Proof (6)
- Pacifism (9)
- Persons (242)
- Aristotle (59)
- Collingwood (163)
- absolute presuppositions (18)
- “ceases to be a mind” (5)
- New Leviathan (70)
- overlap of classes (11)
- Principles of Art (45)
- question and answer (5)
- Descartes (18)
- Leo Strauss (11)
- Midgley (13)
- Pirsig (38)
- Plato (99)
- Philosophy of History (27)
- Sex and Gender (12)
- Stoicism (2)
- Psychology (19)
- Science (30)
- Galileo (7)
- Turkey (97)
- coup (3)
- Istanbul (58)
- Bosphorus (5)
- Gezi (8)
- The Islands (3)
- Tophane (3)
- Nesin Mathematics Village (27)
- Uncategorized (8)
- West Virginia (16)
- Art (185)
-
Recent Posts
Tag Archives: 2024
Sources
January 16, 2024 – 1:48 pm
This is about intellect, wisdom, and prudence. They are strange subjects for discussion.
- If you have them, are you going to spend time talking about them?
- If you haven’t got them, what can you say about them?
Apparently I did talk about them with my classmates when we were undergraduates, even freshmen: too young for prudence, although not for wisdom, by Aristotle’s account below, at least in special pursuits such as geometry and mathematics.
Does that sound like wisdom? According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary (6th edition, 1976), wisdom is
experience and knowledge together with the power of applying them critically or practically; sagacity, prudence, common sense.
Aristotle is talking about σοφία though, and this can mean cleverness. Intellect and prudence are νούς and φρόνησις. Last time we saw the claim that the latter is prudence only in the older sense of “practical judgment,” not the sense of “playing it safe” that is current today.
Memory
January 11, 2024 – 7:23 am
We saw the soul divided in two, in Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics. In the present reading, of the first five of the 13 chapters of Book VI, Aristotle returns to the division, and he tells us he is returning. At least, what we are given in the text is,
πρότερον μὲν οὖν ἐλέχθη δύ᾽ εἶναι μέρη τῆς ψυχῆς.
It was stated previously, then, that there are two parts of the soul.
“It was stated previously.” The passive voice may mean that somebody else added this comment. We may also ask whether the comment is actually referring to an earlier passage of the work that we are now reading.
This is a difficulty of reading Aristotle. We don’t know, or at least I don’t know, whether Aristotle himself created the Ethics as a single work, comprising ten books, to be read in order; and if he did, whether he finished the work to his own satisfaction; and if he did, how well the text that has come down to us (apparently through Andronicus of Rhodes) represents Aristotle’s work.
The Miraculous
January 3, 2024 – 2:48 pm
The miracles recounted in the Gospels are not violations of the laws of nature, because the Evangelists had no conception of those laws in the first place. So I argued in a post of June, 2022. Having encountered resistance to the argument, I return to it now.



