Tag Archives: Ray Kurzweil

Machinations

Sources for this post include the following.

  • On recent events in the US:

    1. Seth Masket, “Friday Night Musk-acre” (February 1, 2025).
    2. Olga Lautman: “Why has Musk gained access to our data?” (February 2, 2025).
    3. Timothy Snyder, “The Logic of Destruction: And how to resist it” (February 2, 2025).
    4. Heather Cox Richardson, “February 2, 2025.”
    5. Malcolm Nance, “In The Trump ‘White’ House: No Spies Matter” (February 7, 2025).
    6. “An Uproar as Trump and Musk Wreak Havoc” (New York Times, letters, February 7, 2025).
    7. Elad Nehorai, “Elon Musk Isn’t a White Nationalist. He’s a White Globalist” (February 7, 2025).
  • On technological fantasies and what they may do to students:

    1. Michael Townsen Hicks, James Humphries, and Joe Slater, “ChatGPT is bullshit” (2024).
    2. John Warner, “AI Boosters Think You’re Dumb” (February 2, 2025).
    3. Seth Bruggeman, “A Crisis of Trust in the Classroom” (January 14, 2025) – students either cheat with technology, or do little of anything.
    4. Robert Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (1974) – perhaps students motivated only by grades should drop out.
    5. Steve Rose (interviewer), “Five ways AI could improve the world: ‘We can cure all diseases, stabilise our climate, halt poverty’” (Thu 6 Jul 2023) – Ray Kurzweil thinks “Our mobile phone … makes us more intelligent,” and since we already have nukes, AI is “not really making life more dangerous”; anyway, “More intelligence will lead to better everything.”
    6. Rachel Uda, “In Such a Connected World, Why Are We Lonelier Than Ever?” (February 6, 2023).
    7. Hanna Rosin interviewing Jonathan Haidt, “The Smartphone Kids Are Not All Right” (March 21, 2024).
  • On a particular fantasy of effortless learning:

    1. Wikipedia, “Decoded neurofeedback.”
    2. Adam Hadhazy, “Science Fiction or Fact: Instant, ‘Matrix’-like Learning” (June 21, 2012).
    3. Takeo Watanabe and others, “Perceptual Learning Incepted by Decoded fMRI Neurofeedback Without Stimulus Presentation” (9 December 2011).
    4. Kevin Le Gendre, “Steel pan virtuoso Leon Foster Thomas: ‘Some people don’t think it’s a serious instrument’ ” (February 24, 2023).
  • Works leading me, somehow, to all of that:

    1. Northrop Frye, The Double Vision (1991).
    2. Peter Jukes, “In a rare interview, Philip Pullman tells us his own origin story, and why the great questions are still religious ones” (13 January 2014).

Towering over tourists are stone figures that have “the body of a bull, wings of an eagle, and the crowned head of a bearded men”
At Persepolis, outside Shiraz, Iran, Tuesday, September 4, 2012, this is the Gate of Xerxes – the Xerxes whose failed invasion of Greece is recounted by Herodotus


Continue reading

Resurrection

White rooster, brown chickens, behind a chain-link fence
From a walk around the neighborhood
Tarabya, Istanbul, Wednesday, October 9, 2024

There were a couple of tweets on the eve of Easter:

Just a reminder to make sure that you preach a doctrine of the resurrection tomorrow that is not reducible to that of the old IWW song “Joe Hill”


It’s a good song! I find it moving! But if that’s all we have to say about the resurrection (and I have heard many sermons that suggest that it is) – well, we should all be doing something else with our lives.

Fortunately, of course, it’s not all we have to say.

Continue reading

On Being Given to Know

  1. What if we could upload books to our brains?
  2. What if a machine could tell us what was true?

We may speculate, and it is interesting that we do speculate, because I think the questions do not ultimately make sense – not the sense that seems to be intended anyway, whereby something can be got for nothing.

Trees, clearings, and houses in the foreground; mountains receding into the background; clouds above
View from Şavşat

Continue reading

NL XLI: What Barbarism Is

Index to this series

Civilization being agreement, barbarism has no chance in the long run (41. 67):

41. 76. For barbarism implies not only a quarrel between any barbarist and any civilized man; it also implies a quarrel between anyone barbarist and any other; and that any state of harmony between them is merely this quarrel suspended.

The barbarist is somebody “who imitates the conditions of an uncivilized world” (41. 53); but an actual attempt to bring about those conditions will need cooperation, and this will be a step towards civility. Here perhaps we should distinguish cooperation from the kind of coerced organization seen in a fascist state. Specific examples will be considered in the later chapters of Part IV of the New Leviathan. We are now considering “What Barbarism Is,” in general terms.

Continue reading