With my presumptuous title, I imitate Arthur Danto’s What Art Is (2013), mentioned in my last post, “Some Say Poetry.” The book is fine, and I have learned from it; but Danto could have learned from Collingwood’s Principles of Art.
-
-
Meta
-
Archives
-
Categories
- Art (163)
- Music (3)
- Poetry (97)
- Homer (72)
- Sylvia Plath (4)
- T. S. Eliot (11)
- Prose (54)
- Visual Art (26)
- Film (5)
- Education (52)
- Facebook (14)
- History (67)
- Archeology (6)
- Tourism (31)
- Language (33)
- Fowler (5)
- Grammar (12)
- Strunk and White (9)
- Turkish (7)
- Logic (12)
- Mathematics (69)
- Exposition (19)
- Mathematical Topics (10)
- Calculus (4)
- Conic Sections (6)
- Mathematicians (27)
- Archimedes (8)
- Euclid (19)
- G. H. Hardy (7)
- Philosophy of Mathematics (16)
- Nature (27)
- Philosophy (239)
- “God is a circle …” (5)
- Categorical Thinking (6)
- Causation (12)
- Contradiction (8)
- Criteriological Science (9)
- dialectic (26)
- Freedom (23)
- Ontological Proof (5)
- Pacifism (9)
- Persons (192)
- Aristotle (21)
- Collingwood (151)
- absolute presuppositions (19)
- “ceases to be a mind” (5)
- New Leviathan (70)
- overlap of classes (11)
- Principles of Art (44)
- question and answer (4)
- Descartes (17)
- Leo Strauss (9)
- Midgley (13)
- Pirsig (27)
- Plato (93)
- Philosophy of History (28)
- Sex and Gender (9)
- Stoicism (2)
- Psychology (19)
- Science (29)
- Galileo (7)
- Turkey (92)
- coup (3)
- Istanbul (56)
- Bosphorus (5)
- Gezi (8)
- The Islands (3)
- Tophane (3)
- Nesin Mathematics Village (26)
- Uncategorized (1)
- West Virginia (16)
- Art (163)
-
Recent Posts
Polytropy 